Prediction of Lea Antonoplis vs Julie Salmon Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
L. Antonoplis vs J. Salmon

Lea Antonoplis

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

125

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Julie Salmon

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

125

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Antonoplis 1 - 0 Salmon

They have played 2 sets in total, with Lea Antonoplis winning 2 and Julie Salmon winning 0. The last match between Lea Antonoplis and Julie Salmon was at the Schenectady, 24-07-1989, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Lea Antonoplis getting the victory 6-2 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Antonoplis	1
Salmon	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Schenectady(07-24-89)

Stats

Lea Antonoplis

Julie Salmon

L. Antonoplis vs J. Salmon H2H Profile

L. Antonoplis	Stats	J. Salmon
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
49.26% (265-273)	Career Total W/L	39.53% (100-153)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

L. Antonoplis vs J. Salmon Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lea Antonoplis has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Julie Salmon has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lea Antonoplis, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Julie Salmon has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Lea Antonoplis has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Julie Salmon has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Lea Antonoplis has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Julie Salmon winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Lea Antonoplis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 78/56), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 90/97). Julie Salmon has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 35/45), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 33% (W/L 13/27).
Player level: In the last year, Lea Antonoplis has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Julie Salmon has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lea Antonoplis winning 1 times and Julie Salmon being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lea Antonoplis winning 2 and Julie Salmon winning 0.
The last match between Lea Antonoplis and Julie Salmon was at the Schenectady, 24-07-1989, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Lea Antonoplis getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lea Antonoplis has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Julie Salmon has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lea Antonoplis has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Julie Salmon has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Lea Antonoplis has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Julie Salmon has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Lea Antonoplis vs Julie Salmon Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

L. Antonoplis vs J. Salmon H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

L. Antonoplis	Stats	J. Salmon
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

L. Antonoplis Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Singapore - 23-04-1990
R2 Pilar VasquezP. Vasquez	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Q1 Ann ThomasA. Thomas	W	6-0 6-0	Stats
ITF Midland 2 - 29-01-1990
R3 Xochitl EscobedoX. Escobedo	L	7-5 0-6 6-4	Stats
ITF New Braunfels - 22-01-1990
R4 Stacey SchefflinS. Schefflin	L	W/O	Stats
R3 Mirijam SchwedaM. Schweda	W	7-5 7-6(5)	Stats

View All

J. Salmon Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Winnipeg - 02-08-1993
R3 Rebecca JensenR. Jensen	L	6-4 2-6 7-5	Stats
Stratton Mountain - 26-07-1993
R2 Christina PapadakiC. Papadaki	L	6-1 7-6	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 21-06-1993
Q1 Claire WeginkC. Wegink	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Birmingham - 07-06-1993
Q1 Kirrily SharpeK. Sharpe	W	6-4 7-5	Stats
ITF Bracknell 1 - 03-05-1993
R4 Lorna WoodroffeL. Woodroffe	L	7-6(4) 6-0	Stats

View All

L. Antonoplis vs J. Salmon Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

L. Antonoplis	Stats	J. Salmon
49.26% (265/273)	YTD Win/Loss	39.53% (100/153)
49.43% (609/623)	Sets Win/Loss	42.06% (241/332)
49.34% (5698/5851)	Games Win/Loss	46.50% (2378/2736)
48.13% (90/97)	Hard Win/Loss	37.70% (23/38)
54.17% (13/11)	Clay Win/Loss	35.71% (10/18)
35.37% (29/53)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.18% (19/25)
58.21% (78/56)	Grass Win/Loss	43.75% (35/45)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
259.31	Average Opponent Rank	399.05
33.33% (1/2)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/1)
57.45% (27/20)	Challenger W/L	38.98% (23/36)
43.06% (31/41)	Futures W/L	30.56% (11/25)
49% (257/521)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	40% (98/247)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
47% (8/17)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	29% (6/21)
50% (92/183)	Deciding Set Win %	42% (31/73)
82% (257/211)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (104/83)
18% (257/45)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (104/20)
18% (268/47)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	10% (146/15)